|
LINEAR RESPONSIBILITY CHART (LRC) FOR STATE SAFETY PROGRAMME
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Linear Responsibility Chart (LRC), describes
the participation by various roles in completing activities /
tasks or deliverables for a project or business
process. It is especially useful in clarifying roles and
responsibilities in cross-functional/departmental projects and processes.The
LRC attempts to clarify the authority and working relationships in the
project team or business process. A
chart that is in the form of a matrix with activities /tasks listed in rows
and departments/persons in the columns.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
S/NO
|
AVIATION ORGANISATION/PERSONS
|
CAA
|
CSP
|
SSM
|
SMS
|
SSC
|
AOE
|
AAI
|
EMA
|
SAG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVITIES/TASKS
|
|||||||||||||||
|
1
|
State Safety Policy
|
●
|
▲
|
■
|
═
|
▲
|
█
|
═
|
|
═
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
State SMS Regulations
|
●
|
▲
|
■
|
▲
|
▲
|
═
|
|
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
State SMS Guidance Materials
|
●
|
█
|
■
|
█
|
█
|
█
|
|
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
State Enforcement Policy
|
●
|
█
|
■
|
█
|
█
|
█
|
|
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Appointment of Key Safety Personnel
|
●■
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
▲
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
National Emergency Response Plan
|
●
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
▲
|
■
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Accident and Incident Investigation
|
▲
|
═
|
|
|
|
|
●■
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Safety Requirements
|
▲
|
█
|
●■
|
▲
|
▲
|
█
|
|
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Safety Performance Agreement
|
●
|
▲
|
■
|
▲
|
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Significant Operational Changes
|
|
|
●■
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Mandatory Reporting Program
|
●■
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Voluntary Reporting Program
|
●
|
|
■
|
|
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Operational Data Analysis
|
|
▲
|
●
|
■
|
|
▲
|
|
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Safety Audit
|
●
|
█
|
■
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Safety Data Acquisition
|
|
|
●■
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Analysis of Safety Data
|
═
|
|
●■
|
▲
|
|
|
═
|
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Safety Risk-Based Audit
|
●
|
█
|
■
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Safety Information Exchange
|
●
|
|
■
|
▲
|
|
|
▲
|
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
National Review
|
●
|
▲
|
▲
|
▲
|
■
|
|
|
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
Continuous Improvement
|
▲
|
═
|
●■
|
═
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
SSP Training Programme
|
●
|
▲
|
■
|
▲
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
Safety Promotion
|
═
|
═
|
●■
|
▲
|
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Safety Culture
|
▲
|
▲
|
●
|
■
|
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
Safety Communication and Awareness
|
▲
|
▲
|
●
|
■
|
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Safety Lesson Learned
|
▲
|
▲
|
●■
|
▲
|
|
█
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LRC SYMBOLS
|
|||||||||||||||
|
■Responsibility: Person who owns the activity, is answerable for quality of the
activity and has the duty to ensure the activity is performed.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
●Authority: Person who has the power to establish,
modify the course of action for the activity and has the duty of approving
the activity. But can delegate the authority.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
▲Must be Consulted:
Person that must be consulted for information and/or subject matter expertise
on the activity.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
═May be Consulted:
Person that may be consulted for information and/or subject matter expertise
on the activity.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
█Must be Notified:
Person that must be notified about the activity
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Benefits of the LRC to SSP include:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
1. Portrays formal authority, responsibility
and accountability among aviation organisations and person for SSP
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2. Help all aviation organisations to
understand how they relate and to know what is expected for teamwork
|
|||||||||||||||
|
3. Acquaints new aviation organisation/ person
with how things are being done
|
|||||||||||||||
|
4. Brings out any potential conflict among
aviation organisations/persons before the trouble starts
|
|||||||||||||||
|
5. Permits all State Aviation Organisations to
see the "big picture" of how each
fits into the overall SSP activities.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
6. Provides a standard for monitoring progress
of State Safety Programme.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
7. It is a practical way to show interfaces
among aviation organisations/persons within the State.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Acronyms
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CAA - Director General of CAA
|
|||||||||||||||
|
CSP - Chief Executive of Service Provider
|
|||||||||||||||
|
SSM - State Safety Manager
|
|||||||||||||||
|
SMS - Safety Manager of Service Provider
|
|||||||||||||||
|
SSC - State Safety Committee (Chief
Executives)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
SAG - State Safety Action Group (Safety
Managers)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
AAI - Head of Accident and Incident
Investigation Bureau
|
|||||||||||||||
|
EMA - Head of Emergency Management Agency
|
|||||||||||||||
|
AOE - Aviation Organisation Employees
|
|||||||||||||||
TRACEABILITY OF AIRCRAFT PARTS
The installer of an aircraft part must determine its eligibility and traceability to approved source before installing the part on the aircraft. For aircraft parts to be eligible and traceable, they must be from a source approved or acceptable to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Aircraft parts must be produced in accordance with a production system and data approved or found acceptable by the regulatory authority of the State of Design. Owner and operator of aircraft are also required to keep current status of aircraft life-limited parts and these records must be transferred to the new owner or operator after the sale. This paper reviews traceability of aircraft parts with special emphasis on approved and acceptable parts, the traceability documentation required, and back-to-birth traceability. EASA Part M.A.501(a) states that “No component may be fitted unless it is in a satisfactory condition, has been appropriately released to service on an EASA Form 1 or equivalen...
Comments
Post a Comment